DCA - BTC (Use Case)
What Are the Results of Applying DCA to Bitcoin?
To explore the effectiveness of applying the DCA strategy, a comparative analysis is presented using what is arguably the most iconic asset in the blockchain ecosystem: Bitcoin (BTC).
The previous chart illustrates:
The value of BTC/USD from January 1st, 2021 (purple line).
The simulated average acquisition price of BTC when using a DCA strategy over the same period (orange dotted line).
As observed in the chart, the green zones represent the only periods during which a traditional spot purchase of BTC would outperform the DCA approach. In contrast, any acquisition made within the red zones results in underperformance when compared to the DCA strategy, producing lower overall returns.
It is important to highlight that these "red" periods—despite being suboptimal—tend to coincide with the moments of highest market activity, as they are typically driven by noticeable upward price movements. This reflects a common emotional behavior: investors are more likely to buy when prices are rising, even if it's not the most rational or profitable time to do so.
This is where one of the greatest advantages of the DCA strategy lies. Beyond reducing the impact of price volatility, DCA removes the emotional burden of having to guess whether the moment of purchase is ideal or not. It eliminates the pressure of market timing entirely and simplifies both the tactical and emotional aspects of investment decision-making.
By adopting this approach, users benefit from a more consistent, disciplined, and stress-free experience—particularly valuable in the inherently volatile environment of crypto assets like Bitcoin.
Simulation – Use Case
To explore this further, the following chart illustrates the returns of a simulated investment program based on three distinct approaches. The simulated scenario spans approximately five years, from January 2020 to February 2025, with a total capital of USD 10,000 allocated to each strategy.
The three simulated strategies above are as follows:
The first strategy represents the "worst possible investor" (in red), who makes five purchases of USD 2,000 each, right at the market peaks—immediately before major BTC price drops.
The second strategy simulates the "best possible investor" (blue), a hypothetical figure who can predict the market perfectly and makes five purchases of USD 2,000 just before major BTC price surges.
The third strategy implements the Dollar Cost Averaging (DCA) method. Here, the capital is divided into 94 entries of approximately USD 106 each, executed at regular 20-day intervals throughout the entire period.
The simulation results evaluate the final average purchased price, the total amount of BTC acquired, the final value of the investment, and the resulting PnL (Profit and Loss) as of February 2, 2025.
Note: The chart used in this simulation does not visually represent the 94 individual DCA entries to keep the visualization simple and easy to interpret.
Results
As expected, the "worst investor" achieved the lowest performance, with an average purchase price of USD 71,223, accumulating 0.150088 BTC, a final investment value of USD 14,500, and a PnL of +45%.
The "best investor", a theoretical benchmark, obtained an average purchase price of USD 29,127, acquiring 0.680381 BTC, with a final investment value of USD 65,731, resulting in a PnL of +557.32%.
Finally, the DCA strategy produced an average purchase price of USD 38,011, with a total of 0.411043 BTC, a final value of USD 39,711, and a PnL of +297.11%.
Conclusion
This simulation demonstrates that a simple, disciplined, and automated a strategy —DCA— can significantly outperform poorly timed emotional decisions as is the case of the first investor/strategy, while coming surprisingly close to the ideal performance of the second, perfectly and uthopicaly optimized, investor/strategy. DCA provides consistently positive returns, protects investors from market timing errors, and simplifies the entire investment process—from execution, to monitoring, to returns.
Last updated